Solution Abstracts


The Army Cyber Center of Excellence (CCoE) is seeking solutions to address emerging or existing challenges. TechNet Augusta attendees and exhibitors are encouraged to submit potential solutions to one of the problem statements below.

What to Expect

Visibility: Title, speaker and abstract details will be published in the following locations: TechNet Augusta Solution Review Showcase webpage, TechNet Augusta program agenda (available via web and mobile app), and the SIGNAL Magazine Solution Review Showcase compendium, published and shared with attendees via the conference website.

Location: Engagement Theater – Reynolds Pavillion, Augusta Convention Center

Set-Up: Designed to encourage interaction and engagement, the space will include a combination of theater style and high-top tables for up to 30 participants. A monitor, laptop and small sound system will be available. Presenters may choose to supply their own laptop.
Internet connectivity will not be provided.

Presentation Length: Time slots are available in 20-minute increments, including Q&A. We encourage presenters to invite attendees back to their exhibit booth to field additional questions.

Additional Notes:

  1. A $1,495.00 administrative fee will be charged to offset operating costs if selected to present.
  2. Preference will be given to companies that are sponsoring and/or exhibiting at TechNet Augusta.
  3. Session content, speakers and schedule are subject to AFCEA International review and approval.
  4. All abstracts received via the submission portal, regardless of whether they were selected for presentation or not, will be included in a SIGNAL Magazine compendium and made available to attendees via the conference website.

CLICK HERE to submit an abstract*. Abstract submissions will close on Sunday, June 28th at 11:59PM (EST).
*Please clearly identify the problem statement you are responding to in your abstract submission.

Problem Statements

Problem Statement 1:

How can quantum-accelerated optimization be integrated into Electromagnetic Warfare (EW) and Combat Systems for real-time threat analysis in GPS-denied environments?

Problem Statement 2:

How can we unify fragmented networks, platforms, and radio systems into a single cohesive infrastructure that preserves individual functionalities while delivering automated PACE routing, dynamic mesh management, intelligent QoS, and centralized boundary security?

Problem Statement 3:

How can we develop validated, resilient Machine-to-Machine (M2M) security protocols to prevent "Synthetic Access" breaches driven by autonomous agentic AI?

Problem Statement 4:

How can we deliver resilient, agile systems that seamlessly unify Electronic Protection, Support, and Attack capabilities to dominate the electromagnetic operational environment (EMOE) across all domains?

Problem Statement 5:

How can we harden existing command and control networks against next-generation cryptographic and algorithmic threats, including advanced digital signature forgery?

Problem Statement 6:

How can we provide high-performance algorithmic execution and tactical database replication at the edge within a ruggedized form factor capable of surviving disconnected, low-bandwidth operations?

Problem Statement 7:

What are the best techniques for real-time optimization in logistics, resource allocation and autonomous swarm management across contested networks?

Problem Statement 8:

How can we deliver intuitive, error-resilient user interfaces that minimize operator cognitive load through automated combat workflows and streamlined UX/UI, allowing tactical teams to focus on high-level combat reasoning rather than menu navigation?

Problem Statement 9:

How can a singular combat network integrate disparate command structures and sensors while minimizing cognitive burden and maximizing network observability through smart flow management and CMOSS/SOSA compliance?

Problem Statement 10:

How can we integrate visual imagery, virtual reality (VR), and spatial imagery tools into command post C2 workflows to enhance situational understanding, operational visualization, and collaborative decision-making?

Problem Statement 11:

What technology exists, or is in development, that the Army has not yet experimented with, that could be a “game changer” for assured voice and data communications, at echelon?